These risks are really surprising. You hold all the liability without any of the copyright benefits.
Here’s the my full video on ChatGPT and blogging: https://youtu.be/kTV2WZl36RE
Have a question or idea for a video? Or maybe you want your site or a specific article reviewed. Let me know here: https://forms.office.com/r/9VYNvRUzaN
Check out Project 24: https://incomeschool.com/project24/?ref=45
Project 24 is our membership program that teaches you how to work toward replacing your current income with income from websites and YouTube channels in 24 months.
Also check out our stupid fast and crazy functional WordPress theme, Acabado. https://incomeschool.com/acabado
Also, our current recommendations for blogging, video, and podcasting gear, software, and other resources can always be found at https://incomeschool.com/tools
Have you seen us on Instagram yet? Add us to see what we’re doing behind the scenes: https://www.instagram.com/income.school/
Project 24 is a product of Income School LLC. Results mentioned are not typical. The trademark “Project 24” refers to the goal of some people to create a successful business in 24 months, but is not a promise or guarantee of that success. Many online businesses fail because, like any business, it requires hard work, skill, and dedication. Before making business decisions, consult financial and legal professionals licensed in your jurisdiction.
source
I would much rather use Jasper and not ChatGPT
How much do you need to change the content that is spit out to make it your own?
Wow FUD isn't something you guys used to be fans of and here you are perpetuating it. Teaching people how to use GPT properly would be far more helpful.
Whether or not you can claim copyright in machine generated content (AI or other) depends on the jurisdiction that you are in. The EU does credit the "arranger" of the content creation. This is in contrast to the USA and Australia.
That's a great point, didn't think about that.
Too early to tell…..Im in agreement with Kyle Roof is that ChatGBT is the article spinner of the 2020s….it has to be edited/fact checked and then on page optimized…by that time? Its probably original. Surfer AI seems to be the tool SEOs are gravitating to, but its expensive.
So what about the people who you outsource your work too are they liable are you liable is something happens. We should be embracing the ways we used AI
This short video is mostly wrong, sir. First, you don't have to state that content was created by Chat GPT, but it is a good idea to do so for transparency to a content creator's readers. You are wrong when you say, 'Because users of Chat GPT didn't create the content, they don't own it' The ownership of the generated content lies with the users who input the prompts and make use of the resulting output. This means that anyone using Chat GPT to create content has legal rights to it.
As of the latest OpenAI policy, content creators using the AI models have specific requirements they need to follow:
Consumer-facing uses of the models in medical, financial, legal industries, news generation or summarization, and other areas where warranted, need to inform users that AI is being used and about its potential limitations.
Automated systems, including conversational AI and chatbots, must disclose to users that they are interacting with an AI system. Products that simulate another person need either that person's explicit consent or be clearly labeled as “simulated” or “parody” unless they depict historical public figures.
Use of model outputs in livestreams, demonstrations, and research are subject to OpenAI's Sharing & Publication Policy.
Plugins that distribute personal communications or content generated by ChatGPT (like emails, messages, or other content) must indicate that the content was AI-generated1.
Regarding ownership, OpenAI's policy as of 2023 states that you, the user, own both the input you provide to the service (the prompts) and the output generated by the AI (the responses). You can use this content for any purpose, including commercial purposes such as sale or publication, if you comply with the terms of service. OpenAI may use the content to provide and maintain the services, comply with applicable law, and enforce their policies. However, the specifics might vary depending on your location and local laws, so it's recommended to consult with a legal professional if you have doubts.
But you can use it to proofread, hey?
ChatGPT make me lazy in blogging 😂
Yeah, AI is trash and using it to create content is embarrassing. Way for people to prove they can't write or come up with ideas.
current AI available to consumers does not 'create' things. it steals things from human creators, then kit bashes those things together and spits out the result
So many people are doing this and why not? where do you draw the line? Can It help, can it do bits, can it do a draft?
None of this is true 😂
Thought by now you’d be sharing ways to PROGRESS and integrate our businesses with AI (including but not limited to GPT), but it looks like you’re just doubling down on telling people not to use it 😂 😂👎👎 This must have been what the older generations looked like in |the past screaming “ the Internet and touch screen cell phones are just a fad” 😂
This also applies for ANY content you place online. You assume risk. I imagine sticking to evergreen content that doesn't typically impact the health or well-being of persons. Use a good disclosure.
What an odd world we are living in 😅
Some SEOS such Kyle Roof agree with usin it but it needs to be edited and modified by someone. However, simply copying and pasting it is indeed useless and no one agrees with it.
There are guys like Matt Diggity promoting the use of A.I. for content creation by Surfer A.I quite loudly..
Do you disclose all the people who help create your content? Are you liable and they aren't? I remember Alec Baldwin created a murder by pointing a loaded gun at someone and pulling the trigger. But he got no charges. 🤷
Chatgpt is a master scraper.
Is this legal advice?
Makes sense. Early on a handful of legitimate AI Content creators warned not to use ChatGPT to create content because of this very issue.
Should probably disclose that you're not a lawyer before talking about legal implications… Especially because when you combine law with new technology, its a pretty grey area.
I treat like a friend
I don't use it to create content exactly. Is it okay if i take help from it in some place like refining a paragraph that i wrote?
I think this is a load of FUD. How would anyone know if its created by AI or not. Especially if it passes the not created by AI check.
The only problem is it's next to impossible to tell if something was written by a chatGpt or not. Especially if you start asking it to write articles based on your inputs.
Unless I'm wrong I'd love to see some of these tools discussed on the channel