THE END OF $0 REAL ESTATE | Major Changes Explained



Thank you to Wealthfront for sponsoring this video! Open up a Wealthfront investment account today through my link and get your first $10,000 managed for free http://invest.wealthfront.com/graham – Enjoy! Add me on Instagram: GPStephan

GET YOUR FREE STOCK WORTH UP TO $50 ON PUBLIC & SEE MY STOCK TRADES: http://www.public.com/graham

JOIN THE WEEKLY MENTORSHIP – https://the-real-estate-agent-academy.teachable.com/p/graham-stephan-mentorship-program/

THE NEW PODCAST: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMSYZVlQmyG8_2MkIKzg0kw

The YouTube Creator Academy:
Learn EXACTLY how to get your first 1000 subscribers on YouTube, rank videos on the front page of searches, grow your following, and turn that into another income source: https://bit.ly/2STxofv $100 OFF WITH CODE 100OFF

The Final Straw Of Real Estate: THE 1031 EXCHANGE.

This is a section of the tax code that allows you to BUY an investment property, and then “Exchange” it for ANOTHER, MORE EXPENSIVE property in the future, without being taxed on that profit in the process.

The expectation here is that, by allowing you to “Exchange” one investment property for another, and deferring taxes in the process, it incentivizes you to consistently “Trade Up” to more expensive real estate, it re-sets the property tax basis to a higher amount when you buy something new, it increases inventory on the market, the high transaction cost supplies money back into the economy through real estate agents, escrow companies, title companies, and inspection companies, and it prevents people from just buying and holding on to property forever until they pass away.

Right now, this new tax proposal would get rid the 1031 exchange, and limit the amount that you can defer into a new property by $500,000 per transaction…where anything over that would be taxed as long term capital gains.

https://www.1031taxreform.com/ling-petrova/

However, a study was done which found that the 1031 exchange led to more liquidity on the market because owners were incentivized to sell, and THAT helped stimulate job creation, investment, and economic growth.

Like I mentioned, every time a property is sold – about 5% of the properties value goes towards selling costs, like agents, title companies, escrow companies, insurance companies, inspection companies, notary fees, and a multitude of other businesses who rely on that…and, in the process…all of THEM end up paying ordinary income tax on the money THEY make.

Second, It was also found that nearly 88% of exchanged real estate was EVENTUALLY disposed of in a taxable sale, resulting in substantially more tax being paid than would have been due had the exchange not occurred.

Not to mention, every single time a property is sold – the tax basis is re-assessed at the new value, meaning – over time – property tax revenue goes up, and the more people buy and sell – the more revenue is generated.

Property owners may also be less inclined to spend money up-keeping the property because they don’t need to maximize value, and that would lead to fewer job demand in contracting, landscaping, and so on.

It could also drive more demand for less expensive real estate, because investors would much rather get a 100% return on their money selling a $1 million dollar home that they bought for $500,000…than a 10% return on a $5.5 million dollar home they bought for $5 million.

And lastly, this could further reduce inventory on the market because investors might be less incentivized to sell, and instead…it might make more sense just to keep it, as-is.

So, even though there are some immediate benefits of reducing the 1031 exchange and generating about $41 more tax revenue over the next 4 years…the NET benefit could actually be significantly lower IF fewer people sell, and because of that, less tax revenue is generated, and fewer jobs are paid in the process.

So, I say…keep the 1031 exchange, BUT get rid of the stepped up tax basis, where heirs would pay the FULL TAX OWED at the time of passing. That way, taxes are never completely eliminated – but, they can be deferred, and then paid in the future – in full.

My ENTIRE Camera and Recording Equipment:
https://www.amazon.com/shop/grahamstephan?listId=2TNWZ7RP1P1EB

For business or one-on-one real estate investing/real estate agent consulting inquiries, you can reach me at GrahamStephanBusiness@gmail.com

*Some of the links and other products that appear on this video are from companies which Graham Stephan will earn an affiliate commission or referral bonus. Graham Stephan is part of an affiliate network and receives compensation for sending traffic to partner sites. The content in this video is accurate as of the posting date. Some of the offers mentioned may no longer be available. This is not investment advice. Public Offer valid for U.S. residents 18+ and subject to account approval. There may be other fees associated with trading. See Public.com/disclosures/

source

What do you think?

Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. Couldn't an heir pay for taxes by leveraging the inherited property rather than sell? Yes, they have to pay that debt back eventually, but that will more easily be covered by rents.

  2. I would have no issue with keeping 1031 if they remove stepped up[ basis on inherited assets. Right now original owners can avoid capital gains with 1031, reduce income with depreciation then pass that on in inheritance with no taxes ever being paid. Deferral of taxes is fine, avoiding them completely is not

  3. I don't get how you can have 3.2m Subs, almost 350k views and only 23k likes. Are that many people so lazy or disinterested that they can't take the one second of effort to click an icon? Very disappointing for the quality and amount of content you produce

  4. By the way, it's not tax free if you don't sell. You pay property taxes. I sold my house in San Diego in April, I was paying almost $10k a year in PT. The new homeowners will be paying $15K.

  5. Graham, you don't want to say it, so I will. Democrats want all of your money and control over everything you do. There, it's been said. But I'm not being political, just facts.

  6. The stepped- up is a ridiculous idea. Keep 1031 exchange. They are also abolishing the EB-5 visa program which allows overseas investors to invest millions in uS businesses whether they reside in the US or not.

  7. Guess what? … They will remove the way of the poor to build wealth and keep the way of the rich to maintain wealth! That's why I only invest in real state funds, prefer not to do it my self and go through all the hassle and have a surprise like that in the middle of the journey!

  8. remember guys, Graham has an incentive to want the property values to go up. Why would he be opposed to limiting the 1031 exchange then? Because it drives down demand, and allows for more competitive pricing which will help lower income people. This will effect his bottom line

  9. What graham isn't telling us is that the limiting of the 1031 exchange will have a DEFLATIONARY effect on property values as well because people aren't buying and selling constantly, thus driving down demand on homes.

  10. Your math doesn’t make sense. In the first half of your example you’re saying you’d be left with 2.4m to purchase the next property, presumably because you also had a 2m mortgage and other expenses to pay. Then you say with a 1031 you’d suddenly have 5m to put in to the next property, but you’d still have th previous mortgage to pay so you’d only have 3m. Am I missing something?

  11. Disengenuis garbage. A sad attempt to keep less informed people from voting away your profit margins by vilianizing fair taxes on investors who snatch up land and property from actual families

  12. I guess that three generation rule excludes the Du Pont family the airs to Morgan Stanley the airs to JPMorgan Chase Nabisco Coca-Cola Kellogg's just find a ticker it's been around since the 1880s and I promise you there's a family with that money still today

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading…

0

Build an Online Business With Me (Make 2000$/Month)

How Safe Is Your Money Now? Watch This